majih
28.06.10,14:26
Dobrý deň
Bol by niekto ochotný skontrolovať esej v angl. jazyku?
Bol by niekto ochotný skontrolovať esej v angl. jazyku?
Chobot
28.06.10,12:49
Dobrý deň
Bol by niekto ochotný skontrolovať esej v angl. jazyku?
Však to sem prilep a niekto sa už len na to pozrie...
Bol by niekto ochotný skontrolovať esej v angl. jazyku?
Však to sem prilep a niekto sa už len na to pozrie...
majih
28.06.10,14:23
OK, vďaka - tak teda jednu posielam.
Slayer666
28.06.10,18:24
Do ktorej triedy chodis? Je tam totiz v priemere jedna chyba na vetu - to nemyslim v zlom, len konstatujem. Myslim, ze by bolo lepsie, keby si aj dostala (dostal?) vysvetlenie k tym chybam, lebo si pleties casto casy, slovesa s pridavnymi a podstatnymi menami, cisla a pod. Pustil by som sa do toho, uz na tom niekto robite?
Slayer666
28.06.10,19:19
Why do people need ideals?
Mohlo by byt aj bez pomocneho 'do'. Potom by to malo vyznam cca. ''(takze vy sa pytate) preco ludia potrebuju vzory?'', ale z toho, ako pokracujes, usudzujem, ze to mala byt normalna otazka, takze s 'do'.
And who is the person who should be the real ideal?
Bez ciarky. Suvisi to s typom vedlajsej vety, ale to ste sa este urcite neucili, takze nevadi.
The first ideal for every man are his parents.
Namiesto every man by som uprednostil everyone.
Children copy their behaviour, speech and everything they do.
Nemoze tam byt 'what', to ma iny vyznam, mohlo tam byt 'that', ale nemusi byt.
Very popular as ideals are famous people. They are beautiful, rich, successful and look happy. Many people want to be like them.
Bud 'lots of', 'a lot of', no najlepsie je 'many' (resp. 'much' pri nepocitatelnych), ked pises takuto essay. No nikdy 'lot of'.
For young people very popular are singers or actors. The teenagers often have their posters hung in their rooms. Many young boys prefer sportsmen, for example footballers or hockey players. Many young girls, on the other hand, adore beautiful models, or other successful women.
S tym many som to uz vysvetlil. Tu frazu som tam vsunul, aby som zmiernil ten efekt opakujuceho sa many. Ale nemusi tam byt.
When I went to primary school, my ideal was my history teacher. She was very intelligent and clever. She was nice and friendly as well. Many schoolchildren loved her history lessons.
Neviem, co si chcela s tym girlfriend, ale asi friendly. Pokial ide o tu poslednu vetu, radsej nieco ako ''Her pupils loved her history lessons.''
When I was a teenager I liked model Claudia Schiffer. I also wanted to be a model, but only for a short time, because I was not tall enough.
V tej druhej vete mi akosi unika suvislost.
Now I know that my biggest ideal has been and still is my mother.
Nemoze byt 'my the'! A je to jednotne cislo, oznamovaci sposob, takze has a nie have.
She has always been there for me to help me with everything. She took care of me when I was ill, she always gave me a good advice when I was down.
Take care about je trochu zvlastna fraza, nepouziva sa velmi. Ale ak ano, tak to znamena davat si pozor na nieco.
Take care of je tu jedna spravna moznost. To znamena starat sa o niekoho, opatrovat.
Care about znamena starat sa v zmysle zaujimat sa. Napr. I don't care about you by znamenalo volne prelozene, ze na teba kaslem.
Care for je druha moznost. Tiez to znamena opatrovat, napr. v chorobe, ako ty pises.
Maybe my mum is not famous and rich, but she is the person who is close to me.
Ta ciarka hrubo vyznacena tam moze, ale nemusi byt. Ostatne prec.
Not like popular stars, who are beautiful and look happy.
Tu by sa ta ciarka aj ziadala. V zasade plati pri vedlajsich predmetovych vetach s who/that/which taketo pravidlo:
1, ak veta definuje predmet, ciarka sa nepise
2, ak veta nedefinuje predmet, ale je tam len ako doplnok (je nadbytocna), ciarka sa pise
Cize v praxi:
1, Genghis Khan, who conquered more land than any other man in history, was born in 1162. Dzingischan, ktory dobyl viac zeme ako ktokolvek iny v dejinach, sa narodil v roku 1162.
2, The infamous Mongol who conquered more land than any other man in history, was born in 1162. Neslavny Mongol....
V prvom pripade je jasne, kto je Dzingischan, teda ta vedlajsia veta je len informacia navyse = nedefinuje predmet.
V druhom pripade nie je vobec jasne, kto je ten neslavny Mongol. Batuchan? Kublaichan? Ogodei? Mongke? Ktory?? Preto je ta vedlajsia veta nevyhnutna, aby sme vedeli, o kom je rec = definuje predmet.
Samozrejme, aj v tom druhom pripade by mohla byt ciarka, ak sme sa uz nejaku tu dobu o Dzingischanovi bavili a teda je jasne, kto je ten neslavny Mongol. Kym to jasne nie je, ciarka tam nebude.
But are they really good ideals for us? It is a very difficult question.
People need good ideals. However, maybe not famous and beautiful faces from posters , but someone, who helps poor people, who takes care of sick children. Someone who offers his life for the others. I would like to live that way to be an ideal to my children.
Este to niekto prejdite, lebo mne to uz nemysli.:D
PS: Vravel som, ze mi to uz nemysli. Nieco som este poopravoval.
Mohlo by byt aj bez pomocneho 'do'. Potom by to malo vyznam cca. ''(takze vy sa pytate) preco ludia potrebuju vzory?'', ale z toho, ako pokracujes, usudzujem, ze to mala byt normalna otazka, takze s 'do'.
And who is the person who should be the real ideal?
Bez ciarky. Suvisi to s typom vedlajsej vety, ale to ste sa este urcite neucili, takze nevadi.
The first ideal for every man are his parents.
Namiesto every man by som uprednostil everyone.
Children copy their behaviour, speech and everything they do.
Nemoze tam byt 'what', to ma iny vyznam, mohlo tam byt 'that', ale nemusi byt.
Very popular as ideals are famous people. They are beautiful, rich, successful and look happy. Many people want to be like them.
Bud 'lots of', 'a lot of', no najlepsie je 'many' (resp. 'much' pri nepocitatelnych), ked pises takuto essay. No nikdy 'lot of'.
For young people very popular are singers or actors. The teenagers often have their posters hung in their rooms. Many young boys prefer sportsmen, for example footballers or hockey players. Many young girls, on the other hand, adore beautiful models, or other successful women.
S tym many som to uz vysvetlil. Tu frazu som tam vsunul, aby som zmiernil ten efekt opakujuceho sa many. Ale nemusi tam byt.
When I went to primary school, my ideal was my history teacher. She was very intelligent and clever. She was nice and friendly as well. Many schoolchildren loved her history lessons.
Neviem, co si chcela s tym girlfriend, ale asi friendly. Pokial ide o tu poslednu vetu, radsej nieco ako ''Her pupils loved her history lessons.''
When I was a teenager I liked model Claudia Schiffer. I also wanted to be a model, but only for a short time, because I was not tall enough.
V tej druhej vete mi akosi unika suvislost.
Now I know that my biggest ideal has been and still is my mother.
Nemoze byt 'my the'! A je to jednotne cislo, oznamovaci sposob, takze has a nie have.
She has always been there for me to help me with everything. She took care of me when I was ill, she always gave me a good advice when I was down.
Take care about je trochu zvlastna fraza, nepouziva sa velmi. Ale ak ano, tak to znamena davat si pozor na nieco.
Take care of je tu jedna spravna moznost. To znamena starat sa o niekoho, opatrovat.
Care about znamena starat sa v zmysle zaujimat sa. Napr. I don't care about you by znamenalo volne prelozene, ze na teba kaslem.
Care for je druha moznost. Tiez to znamena opatrovat, napr. v chorobe, ako ty pises.
Maybe my mum is not famous and rich, but she is the person who is close to me.
Ta ciarka hrubo vyznacena tam moze, ale nemusi byt. Ostatne prec.
Not like popular stars, who are beautiful and look happy.
Tu by sa ta ciarka aj ziadala. V zasade plati pri vedlajsich predmetovych vetach s who/that/which taketo pravidlo:
1, ak veta definuje predmet, ciarka sa nepise
2, ak veta nedefinuje predmet, ale je tam len ako doplnok (je nadbytocna), ciarka sa pise
Cize v praxi:
1, Genghis Khan, who conquered more land than any other man in history, was born in 1162. Dzingischan, ktory dobyl viac zeme ako ktokolvek iny v dejinach, sa narodil v roku 1162.
2, The infamous Mongol who conquered more land than any other man in history, was born in 1162. Neslavny Mongol....
V prvom pripade je jasne, kto je Dzingischan, teda ta vedlajsia veta je len informacia navyse = nedefinuje predmet.
V druhom pripade nie je vobec jasne, kto je ten neslavny Mongol. Batuchan? Kublaichan? Ogodei? Mongke? Ktory?? Preto je ta vedlajsia veta nevyhnutna, aby sme vedeli, o kom je rec = definuje predmet.
Samozrejme, aj v tom druhom pripade by mohla byt ciarka, ak sme sa uz nejaku tu dobu o Dzingischanovi bavili a teda je jasne, kto je ten neslavny Mongol. Kym to jasne nie je, ciarka tam nebude.
But are they really good ideals for us? It is a very difficult question.
People need good ideals. However, maybe not famous and beautiful faces from posters , but someone, who helps poor people, who takes care of sick children. Someone who offers his life for the others. I would like to live that way to be an ideal to my children.
Este to niekto prejdite, lebo mne to uz nemysli.:D
PS: Vravel som, ze mi to uz nemysli. Nieco som este poopravoval.
majih
06.07.10,08:29
Ďakujem, za ochotu, i úvodné povzbudenie :), eseje sa iba učím písať, preto aj prosím o kontrolu.
ešte raz vďaka, viem že to chce veľa času. pa
ešte raz vďaka, viem že to chce veľa času. pa